An independent side-by-side ethics comparison of Cuyana and Open Farm across certifications, average sustainability score and product range.
87.3/100 avg ethics
3 products tracked
Certifications
93.1/100 avg ethics
10 products tracked
Certifications

A sophisticated, women-owned brand travel backpack made from 100% recycled plastics and sustainable Italian leather accents.

A sophisticated, LWG-certified Italian leather tote designed with a 'fewer-better' philosophy.

An ultra-soft, responsibly sourced alpaca wool scarf produced by heritage artisans in Peru, promoting the 'fewer, better' philosophy of sustainable fashion.

Industry-leading transparency with 100% traceable ingredients and high-welfare seafood standards.

Ethically sourced, single-ingredient dog chews that prioritize animal welfare and complete supply chain transparency.

A premium, ethically sourced freeze-dried raw food topper that prioritizes animal welfare and supply chain transparency. Using humanely raised chicken and wild-caught salmon, this product offers a nutrient-dense boost for feline diets while adhering to strict environmental standards.

A premium, highly transparent dog treat utilizing ocean-friendly salmon and traceable ingredients, backed by rigorous B Corp standards and third-party animal welfare audits.

A premium, fully traceable dry dog food featuring wild-caught Alaskan salmon and nutrient-dense ancient grains, prioritized for animal welfare and environmental transparency.

Open Farm stands out as a global leader in pet nutrition transparency, offering a premium freeze-dried raw topper that prioritizes animal welfare and supply chain traceability.
Open Farm scores higher on independent ethics scoring: Cuyana averages 87.3/100 vs Open Farm at 93.1/100.
Cuyana appears with 7 verified certifications (Global Recycled Standard, OEKO-TEX, LWG Gold Certified, 1% for the Planet, B Corp). Open Farm appears with 8 (B Corp, Certified Humane, MSC, Ocean Wise, Leaping Bunny).
Yes. Both brands are scored by the same methodology — never paid placement. See our methodology page for the weighting.