Mostly — Three Farmers scores 78/100. It clears our bar on 2 of 4 ethics signals, with gaps worth checking before you buy.
| Check | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cruelty-free | unverified | No third-party cruelty-free certification found on the products we track. |
| Vegan options | verified | Certified vegan products appear in this brand's range. |
| Sells in mainland China | unverified | We have not confirmed this brand's mainland China distribution. |
| Third-party certified | verified | We record 3 distinct certifications across this brand's products. |
| Certifications | on file | Vegan, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free |
Scored with our public methodology.
Three Farmers offers 1 product on EthiCompare across Food & Nutrition, with an average ethics score of 78/10 and recurring certifications including Vegan, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free.
Is Three Farmers ethical and cruelty-free? Read the verdict
Verified credentials appearing across Three Farmers's product range.
Average scores across our scoring pillars.
Where Three Farmers shows up across our directory.
Strengths mentioned most often across Three Farmers's products.
"Home-compostable packaging; carbon offset shipping; direct farm sourcing reduces food miles; regenerative crop rotation."

A crunchy, lightly sweet granola made from Canadian-grown hemp seeds, quinoa, amaranth, and oats, supporting small-scale prairie farmers.
We have no cruelty-free certification on file for Three Farmers's scored products. Absence of a certification is not proof of animal testing, but it does mean nothing independent has been verified.
Three Farmers averages 78/100 across the 1 products we have scored, using public certifications, sourcing disclosures and controversy records.
Parent-company ownership changes what your money supports. See our brand ownership map for the current group structure and any conflicting parent-company records.
Our alternatives page ranks comparable products by ethics score with a side-by-side difference table, so you can see exactly which pillar improves.