Is Back to the Roots sustainable?
Broadly yes — Back to the Roots averages 91/100 on EthiCompare, and its packaging, sourcing and certification record hold up better than most brands we track. Independent certifications on its products back part of the claim.
We read sustainability as verifiable practice, not marketing: third-party certification, packaging design, sourcing disclosure and published, dated targets. Claims without evidence score as unverified.
The evidence behind the answer
Cruelty-freeunverified
No third-party cruelty-free certification found on the products we track.
Third-party certifiedverified
We record 3 distinct certifications across this brand's products.
Scored with our public methodology.
More on Back to the Roots
Back to the Roots: frequently asked
Is Back to the Roots sustainable?+
Broadly yes — Back to the Roots averages 91/100 on EthiCompare, and its packaging, sourcing and certification record hold up better than most brands we track. Independent certifications on its products back part of the claim.
Back to the Roots: Cruelty-free?+
No third-party cruelty-free certification found on the products we track.
Back to the Roots: Vegan options?+
We have not verified certified vegan formulations for this brand.
Back to the Roots: Sells in mainland China?+
We have not confirmed this brand's mainland China distribution.
Back to the Roots: Third-party certified?+
We record 3 distinct certifications across this brand's products.
What is Back to the Roots's ethics score?+
Back to the Roots averages 91/100 across 1 product we score on certifications, sourcing, labour, packaging and transparency.