Stasher Reusable Silicone Bags vs The Reusable Paper Towel (24-pack)
Compare Stasher Reusable Silicone Bags (B Corp, ethics 89) and Marley's Monsters Reusable Paper Towels (88/100). Which zero-waste product wins? Find out.
Stasher
WinnerStasher Reusable Silicone Bags
89/100 ethics
$$ · 3 certifications
View Stasher Reusable Silicone Bags →Marley's Monsters
The Reusable Paper Towel (24-pack)
88/100 ethics
$$ · 2 certifications
View The Reusable Paper Towel (24-pack) →Ethics breakdown
| Dimension | Stasher Reusable Silicone Bags | The Reusable Paper Towel (24-pack) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sourcing | 80 | 75 | +5 |
| Labor | 85 | 98 | -13 |
| Environment | 95 | 92 | +3 |
| Animal welfare | 100 | 100 | 0 |
| Transparency | 86 | 85 | +1 |
| Overall ethics | 89 | 88 | 1 |
Why it wins
Stasher's B Corp certification and slightly higher ethics score (89 vs 88) give it a marginal but decisive advantage, while both products share similar price points and other certifications.
Overview
Both Stasher reusable silicone bags and Marley's Monsters reusable paper towels aim to eliminate single-use waste in the kitchen, but they tackle different problems. Stasher offers high-quality, airtight silicone bags ideal for storing leftovers, snacks, or sous vide cooking. Marley's Monsters provides a 24-pack of flannel-based, unpaper towels that replace standard paper rolls. Both are priced moderately ($$) and share certifications like 1% for the Planet and Woman-Owned. However, Stasher holds an extra B Corp certification, giving it an edge in overall ethical rating (89 vs 88).Ethics diff
The ethics scores are close, but Stasher’s 89 earns a slight lead thanks to its B Corp certification, which requires rigorous third-party assessment of social and environmental performance. Marley's Monsters, while still strong (88) and also supporting environmental causes, lacks that specific certification. Both support women-owned businesses and donate to planetary causes, but Stasher’s broader ethical framework gives it an advantage.Everyday use
In daily life, these products serve different functions. Stasher bags are excellent for food storage, travel, and cooking—they are leak-proof, dishwasher-safe, and flexible. Marley’s Monsters towels are perfect for wiping counters, cleaning up spills, and replacing disposable paper towels. The towels are washable and come in a 24-pack, making them a durable alternative for messes. For a kitchen that aims to be fully zero-waste, you might want both: Stasher for food preservation, Marley’s for cleaning.Value
Both offer long-term savings over disposables. Stasher bags are a one-time purchase that can replace hundreds of plastic bags; a 4-pack typically lasts for years. Marley’s Monsters towels are cost-effective: a 24-pack replaced around 1,500 paper towel rolls over their lifespan. While Stasher bags may have a higher upfront cost per item, their versatility in cooking and storage adds distinct value.Bottom line
Neither product is a clear loser, but if you must pick one for a single ethical purchase, Stasher edges ahead due to its B Corp certification and slightly higher ethics score. However, if your kitchen is still using disposable paper towels, Marley’s Monsters offers a powerful shift. For a holistic ethical kitchen, both are strong contenders—but Stasher wins on certification breadth.
The original platinum silicone storage bag that eliminates the need for single-use plastics. Stasher is a leader in the reusables movement with a strong commitment to ocean health.

Handmade in Oregon, these 'UNpaper' towels offer a high-quality, zero-waste alternative to disposable paper products, focusing on local manufacturing and textile waste reduction.
Not sold on either? Browse ethical alternatives
Each hub ranks the highest-scoring swaps in the same categories, on the same rubric.