Head-to-head
The Thuma Bed (The Bed) vs The Re-Chore Chair
Compare Thuma The Bed (FSC, GREENGUARD Gold) vs Model No. The Re-Chore Chair (B Corp, recycled materials) for ethical shopping. Ethics, value & use.
Ethics breakdown
| Dimension | The Thuma Bed (The Bed) | The Re-Chore Chair | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sourcing | 96 | 98 | -2 |
| Labor | 90 | 95 | -5 |
| Environment | 98 | 99 | -1 |
| Animal welfare | 100 | 100 | 0 |
| Transparency | 92 | 92 | 0 |
| Overall ethics | 94 | 96 | -2 |
Why it wins
Model No. edges out Thuma with a higher ethics score (96 vs 94) and comprehensive B Corp certification, alongside its innovative use of 100% recycled materials verified by Global Recycled Standard.
Overview
Thuma's “The Bed” and Model No.'s “The Re-Chore Chair” are two standout pieces in the ethical furniture world, each scoring high on our ethics scale. Thuma (94/100) is a minimalist, platform-style bed frame made from upcycled wood and rubberwood, with certifications from FSC, GREENGUARD Gold, Climate Neutral, and 1% for the Planet. Model No. (96/100) is a sculptural, ergonomic chair crafted from recycled post-industrial wood waste and bioplastics, earning B Corp certification and Global Recycled Standard verification. Both are premium priced at $$$$ but deliver very different experiences.Ethics diff
The key ethical differences lie in their certifications and materials. Thuma's FSC and GREENGUARD Gold ensure responsible forestry and low indoor emissions, while its Climate Neutral certification and 1% for the Planet pledge signal strong carbon offsetting and charitable contributions. Model No. goes further with B Corp status, which mandates rigorous social and environmental accountability across the entire business, plus the Global Recycled Standard ensures high recycled content. While Thuma scores an impressive 94, Model No. edges ahead at 96 due to its holistic B Corp assessment and use of waste materials that divert landfill.Everyday use
In daily life, Thuma's bed is a long-term investment—silent, tool-free assembly, sturdy for years, and perfect for those who need a durable, low-maintenance sleep foundation. The Re-Chore Chair, meanwhile, is designed for active seating; it gently rocks and encourages movement, making it ideal for a home office or creative studio. It's lightweight and easy to move but may not suit everyone's posture preferences. The bed is a static anchor, while the chair is dynamic—both are well-reviewed for durability and design.Value
Both products command high prices, but value depends on need. Thuma's bed, starting around $1,000+, offers exceptional long-term value for a bedroom centerpiece that will last decades and comes with a 10-year warranty. Model No.'s chair, around $800, is costlier than a standard chair but reflects artisanal construction and recycled materials; the B Corp premium supports fair wages and local manufacturing. For a single statement piece, the chair gives higher ethical marks per dollar, while the bed provides greater functional utility over time.Bottom line
If you prioritize a whole-business ethical commitment, choose Model No.'s Re-Chore Chair. If you need a foundational, emission-safe bed with solid eco-credentials, Thuma wins. In a direct face-off, Model No. takes the crown with a 96 ethics score and transformative use of waste materials.
Excellent
FSC CertifiedGREENGUARD Gold1% for the PlanetClimate Neutral
4.9 (18,500)
A masterfully engineered platform bed made from upcycled rubberwood, featuring Japanese joinery that requires no metal tools or hardware.

Excellent
B CorpGlobal Recycled Standard
4.6 (42)
A revolutionary 3D-printed chair made from upcycled food waste and plant-based resins, manufactured on-demand in the USA to eliminate waste.
Not sold on either? Browse ethical alternatives
Each hub ranks the highest-scoring swaps in the same categories, on the same rubric.